Max Rady College of Medicine
Concept: Rates of Utilization
Concept Description
Last Updated: 20010503
Introduction

Rates of events, typically by geographical regions, are frequently computed in epidemiologic and health services research. There are many different types of rates which can be computed and compared.
A. Rates  Definitions

Rate
 calculated by dividing the number of events (e.g. deaths among persons aged 064) by the population at risk of experiencing the event (e.g. total population aged 064) in the defined "study population" over a particular unit of time (e.g. one year).

Crude (overall) rate
 the actual number of events over all confounding variable(s) (e.g. age groups, gender) divided by the total (eg. over all age groups, gender) population. A crude rate is a summary of the specific rates.

Specific rate
 Specific the number of events within a specified set of confounding variable(s) (e.g. age group & gender) in a "study population" divided by the total population within the set of confounding variable(s). For example, hospitalizations among males, aged 6064 divided by the population aged 6064.

Standard population
 the reference population used to standardize rates; it can be the total population of the areas, or, when comparing multiple sets of data (i.e., multiple years of events) it would be one specific set of data (i.e., one of the years.) The choice of the reference population is dependent upon the study question.

Standardized rate
 a summarized rate which essentially adjusts a crude rate by accounting for one or more confounding variables. Direct and indirect rates are both examples of standardized rates.

Direct rate
 the expected number of events per 1000 people if the study population had the same distribution of confounding groups (i.e., sex and age groups) as did the standard population.

Indirect rate
 the expected number of events per 1000 people if the study population had the same rate of events for each confounding group as did the standard population.

Standard Mortality / Morbidity Ratio (SMR)
 the ratio of the number of events observed in the study population to the number of events that would have been expected in the study population, if the study population had the same rate of events for each confounding group as did the standard population.
Note: the choice of 1000 as a base is arbitrary, it could be any number for which we wish to express the rate as "so many events per that many people". Generally the number is also chosen so that the rate is expressed as a whole number (e.g. 1.245 per 1,000 rather than 0.1245 per 100).
B. Rates of Rare Events

When computing rates of rare events, keep in mind that the method of grouping the data could change the rates significantly.
Example: When calculating premature mortality rates, using 5yr age groups (i.e., 14, 59, 1014, etc.) can lead to a large number of strata with 0 deaths, even when multiple years of mortality data are used.Solution: Use larger age groups (e.g., 014, 1524, etc.) to group data. The smaller the population being studied, the larger the age grouping should be. Age groups should be representative of the data you are working with. If you are unsure as to whether your age groups need to be refined, try running a histogram of the population groups.
C. Comparisons of Rates

Methods:

A
nonparametric approach
means that we need not assume that the data originate from a known distribution, i.e., normal or binomial.

A
binary event
is an event that either occurs or does not occur. For example, a person is either admitted to the hospital or is not. A
nonbinary event
is an event which cannot be classified on a yes/no basis; Length of stay or number of discharges for example.

A
nonrecurrent event
is an event that can occur only once, e.g., an appendectomy. A recurrent event is an event which can occur more than once, e.g., a myocardial infarction.
 Personlevel data is individuallevel data. The data have not been summarized.
Carriere and Roos (1994),(1997) have developed methods that may be used to compare standardized rates of events.
The methods use a nonparametric approach, and may be applied to binary and nonbinary events, recurrent and nonrecurrent events, regardless of the incidence rate of the event and regardless of whether the data are personbased.
Multiple versus single records per person
 If there are multiple records per person, the event is recurrent and may be studied as a binary event (e.g. at least one admission for asthma) or as a nonbinary event (e.g. number of admissions for asthma, or number of days in hospital).
 If there is only a single record per person, the event may be recurrent but only one record per person is chosen (randomly or by using first.phin for example) and may be studied as a binary event (i.e., at least one admission for myocardial infarction) or as a nonbinary event (i.e., length of stay).
 The event for the single record may be nonrecurrent and may be studied as a binary event (i.e., an appendectomy) or as a nonbinary event (i.e., length of stay).
Comparing Rates:
Definitions for the list below:
 Overall Test  an overall test answers a general question of 'Is there a difference?'
 Specific Test  If the answer to an overall test is 'Yes, there is a difference', a specific test will answer the question 'Where exactly is the difference?
A. Comparing rates for different areas (See POP Rate Macro Documentation below for an example and relevant SAS code for each test described) (internal access only) .Test 1  An overall test to determine if all subareas have the same rate. A test that is significant indicates that "not all the rates are the same." BUT, it does not identify which rate(s) differ.B. Comparing rates for different groups
Test 2  Overall test to determine if the rates for each area are the same as:a. the rate for the total area.
If the test is significant, then "at least one area has a rate that differs from the rate for the total area." BUT, it does not identify which area(s) have a different rate. See Test 3a for the followup test.
b. any prespecified rate.
If the test is significant then "at least one area has a rate that differs from the prespecified rate" BUT, it does not identify which area(s) have a different rate. See Test 3b for the followup test.
Test 3 Specific test to determine which rates differ from:a. the rate for the total area (followup to Test 2a)
If at least one area has a rate which is different from the rate for the total area this test will identify the area that differs. Each area's rate must be compared with the rate for the total area (after adjusting for multiple comparisons).
b. any prespecified rate (followup to Test 2b)
If at least one area has a rate which is different from the prespecified rate this test will identify the area(s) that differ(s). Each area's rate must be compared with the prespecified rate (after adjusting for multiple comparisons)Test 4  Test if the rates for each area are the same for two groups (overall test).
Test 5  Test which areas have rates which are different for the two groups (specific test).
Test 6  Test if the differences in rate for each area are the same for two groups.
C. Comparing the degree of variation in ratesTest7  Compare degrees of variation in the rates.These comparisons may be carried out using a T^{ 2} statistic, which follows a chisquare distribution, or using a ratio of two T^{ 2} statistics, which follows an F distribution.a. for two groups.
b. for two regions.
If the rates for each area are not the same, they can be further examined by testing for a linear trend.
The POP_RATE Macro

The
pop_rate macro
developed by MCHP computes the crude (C), directly standardized (D), and indirectly standardized (I) rates for events. A description of the macro is available as a
Pop_Rate pdf file
(internal access only)
.

To test if the rates for the various areas are equivalent, examine the Pvalue (PC, PD, or PI, depending on which type of rate is being considered.) If the Pvalue is small, smaller than alpha, the rates are not equivalent, i.e., at least one rate is different from another.

The 2nd test is not computed by the POP_RATE macro, however, using the output produced by the macro, the teststatistic may be computed as described in
Carriere and Roos (1994).
 To determine which rates differ from the prespecified rate, first carry out a Bonferroni adjustment (adjusts the level of significance) for multiple comparisons ( Carriere and Roos (1997). ), then set this value to be the confidence level on which the confidence intervals are based. The resulting confidence interval (LC,UC),(LD,UD), or (LI,UI) depending on which type of rate is being considered) may be examined for each area to see if the prespecified rate falls inside. An area whose interval includes the prespecified rate has a rate which does not differ from the prespecified rate, while an area whose interval does not include the prespecified rate has a rate which differs from the prespecified rate.
The tests described above can be carried out as follows:
The 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th tests (points B & C above) are not computed by the POP_RATE macro. However, by creating new areas, one for each group in each area, and using the output produced by the macro, the test statistics may be computed as described in Carriere and Roos (1994).
The test for linear trend is not computed by the POP_RATE macro. However, using the output produced by the macro, the test statistic may be computed.
Note: The default for the POP_RATE macro is to use a logarithmic transformation when calculating the T^{ 2} statistics. When calculating, by hand, teststatistics using output produced by the POP_RATE macro, you should use the logarithmic transformation as described in Carriere and Roos (1994), (1997) .
MORE INFORMATION
 Carriere KC and Roos LL.(1994) Comparing Standardized Rates of Events. American Journal of Epidemiology; 140: 47282.
 Lilienfeld AM. (1976). Foundations of Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press.
 Manitoba Centre for Health Policy and Evaluation (1996). Population Health Information System Rates Macro. Version 6. University of Manitoba.
Related concepts
Related terms
 Adjusted Mortality Ratio (AMR)
 Adjusted Rates
 Indirect Standardization of Rates
 Poisson Distribution
 Rate Standardization
References
 Carriere KC, Roos LL. A method of comparison for standardized rates of lowincidence events. Medical Care 1997;35(1):5769. [Abstract] (View)
 Last JM. A dictionary of epidemiology. 3rd edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1995. 00.(View)
Keywords
 statistics
Request information in an accessible format
If you require access to our resources in a different format, please contact us:
 by phone at 2047893819
 by email at info@cpe.umanitoba.ca
We strive to provide accommodations upon request in a reasonable timeframe.
Contact us
Manitoba Centre for Health Policy
Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine,
Rady Faculty of Health Sciences,
Room 408727 McDermot Ave.
University of Manitoba
Winnipeg, MB R3E 3P5 Canada